On March 15, 2011, the Commission issued Order No. 745, “Demand Response Compensation in Organized Wholesale Energy Markets” (“Order No. 745” or the “Final Rule”).  Order No. 745 required that organized wholesale energy markets administered by a Regional Transmission Organization (“RTO”) or Independent System Operator (“ISO”) compensate demand response resources at the market price for energy, or locational marginal price (“LMP”), if the demand resource is able to displace a generation resource in an RTO/ISO effort to balance supply and demand and when proscribed by a new “net benefits test.”

On March 14, 2010, Chairman Wellinghoff responded to a February 2011 letter from senators Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Richard Burr (R-N.C.) (collectively the “senators”) who expressed concern that the forthcoming Final Rule stemming from the rulemaking on Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation (see June 18, 2010 edition of the WER) will make customers who receive little or no benefit from a transmission project pay for a majority of the project. 

On February 28, 2011, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or the “Commission”) conditionally accepted in part updates to the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.’s (“Midwest ISO”) Open Access Transmission, Energy, and Operating Reserve Markets Tariff (“tariff”) that created a new category of resources named Dispatchable Intermittent Resources.  This new category will allow wind to be treated like other power resources and participate in the region’s real-time energy market.

On March 2, 2011, PPL EnergyPlus, LLC (“PPL EnergyPlus”) filed a complaint at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or the “Commission”) alleging that PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (“PJM”) failed to conduct its annual financial transmission rights (“FTR”) auctions and auction revenue rights (“ARR”) allocations according to the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff (“OATT”). 

On February 22, 2011, Michael Bardee, General Counsel for FERC, submitted comments in response to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s  (“CFTC”) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking  (“NOPR”) on the elective exception to mandatory clearing for swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”).