In its May 26, 2023 opinion in Sierra Club v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (an article on the rest of the opinion regarding FERC’s environmental review of the Mountain Valley Pipeline can be found here), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit addressed challenges to its jurisdiction to hear appeals of Commission rehearing orders when they are denied by operation of law and the Commission subsequently modifies the underlying order after said denial.

On May 11, 2023, FERC notified Mankato Energy Center, LLC and Mankato Energy Center II, LLC (“Mankato Companies”) that it will release certain privileged information included in the initial brief that Mankato Companies submitted in an ongoing proceeding section 206 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) to determine whether Mankato companies and J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (“J.P. Morgan Investment”) are affiliated for purposes of the FPA.  FERC reasoned that disclosing certain privileged information is necessary to carry out the Commission’s jurisdictional responsibilities in evaluating whether the Mankato Companies’ upstream ownership raises market power concerns.  Commissioner Danly dissented in a separate statement, arguing that FERC could instead release a redacted order.

A group of 17 states, through their Attorneys General (“State AGs”), filed a motion (“Motion”) on May 10, 2023, requesting that the Commission audit and investigate whether BlackRock is acting as an “activist” investor, thereby violating Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) and the Commission’s latest reauthorizations for BlackRock to acquire public utility securities. The Motion comes shortly after Commissioners Danly and Christie issued a joint statement regarding a different investment company, Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”), questioning whether Vanguard’s “enormous accumulation” of utility assets may enable it to exercise “profound control” over those utilities.